Skip to content

Join our feedback community




Join our feedback community

Categories

1536 results found

  1. Need the ability to edit expense claims after they have been approved. There are times when publishing fails due to the details listed on the expense claim (e.g. date is for a period that is locked, or claim supplier name is rejected). The only way to correct is by rejecting, changing, resubmitting for approval, & approving. This causes the approver to get approval notification again, which is not ideal.

    12 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  2. I know how to manually refresh the lists. I just don't remember prior to processing. I would like to be able to set a schedule for clients that use Projects/Customers so it is something I do not have to remember.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  3. Ability to turn off features not being used by a company such as sales/bank/certain details not needed in a cost, to make the platform more refined and easier for users.

    11 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  4. As vault will be a fee-based add on, DEXT should allow clients to choose if they want to allow access to this. I recently had a staff of a client use vault quietly when he should have been using inbox for his normal expenses. DEXT does not currently allow me as admin to prevent him from doing this.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  5. Would be great to customise flags practice-wide for all clients. We want a standardised approach, especially for the apprentices. Great feature but would make more sense practice-wide than changing it on individual client basis

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  6. For Zoho Books bills, we have created some custom fields such as suggested payment date and how the payment will be made (direct debit, manual etc). There doesn't seem to be any option to populate these fields in Dext, so have to reopen them in Zoho to add these in. So I would like Dext to be able to pull any custom fields per the company on Zoho as well as the criteria requirements (such as drop down, or date)

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  7. Additional types of documents in sales section

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  8. It would be great if Dext could email us about recent features and enhancements so that we can be aware of things changing. This would enable us to adopt the changes in a timely manner.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  9. Facility for CIS and Reverse charge suppliers to be processed through Dext, either from supplier, client or App.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  10. The Sales button is right next to the Camera button on the App. So it is very easy to accidentally tap that button instead of the Camera button, which then sends all subsequent scans to the Sales Inbox when they were intended for the Costs Inbox. While there is a way to move the items to the correct Inbox, there seems to be no way to trigger Dext to re-extract the fields using the Supplier rules.

    How about asking for confirmation when switching Inboxes?

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  11. On the duplicate review screen we can see the two invoices, but now that approvals are available in Dext, there is no way for the reviewer to see if the original was rejected and what the rejection reason was to ensure whatever criteria was fixed. If for instance, an invoice was rejected because it was missing information or a PO number, there is currently no flag on that review page to indicate that the original was rejected so when it is confirmed that it is the same invoice, the new submission is also now attached and automatically archived and never…

    8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  12. Our employees that are standard users are still able to edit, delete, archive, unarchive expense claims that were already approved and published. this is defeating the purpose as it creates chaos after publishing. Please change it so that once an expense claim is approved, it cannot be edited/archived/unarchived, etc.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  13. To be able to only partly invoice items from a quote and leave the rest as un-invoiced, to be invoiced further down the line.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  14. I want there to be a column on the paperwork request button in QB using the Dextention that shows which sub-user account it is that had the transaction. In the transactions page in Dext, this is an option.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  15. When checking for duplicated invoices, Dext ignores the amount but report whenever there are two or more invoices from the same supplier with the same reference number.

    This way duplicated invoices with differring amounts will get picked up. At the moment these invoices slips through the cracks.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  16. Edit to workflow so that when an approver rejects an item, they are required to put in a reason.

    i see a lot of items getting rejected without a reason being given, so im having to reach out to the rejecter for an explanation on why it was rejected and what needs to be changed.

    For the sake of clarity, i think there should be an option to make a approver require a reason for rejection/cancellation in order to reject/cancel.

    this would provide training opportunities for the processer, so that the same mistakes are not being made over and over.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  17. Upload the certificate to Dext, then tell Dext how much the invoice is for, and who it's for and the date, and then process to Xero, creating an invoice in Xero with those details, but also picking up the next available Xero invoice number, rather than the document reference that is in Dext.

    2 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  18. Approval to include "if not" criteria.
    Approval Re-assign function to other approver.

    12 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  19. I'm wishing for a thumbnail view option in the Inbox. Case in point, I am looking at a list of documents from Vendor 1 (filtered list). And i know some of them are just statements or advertisements while others are invoices. A thumbnail view would let me see what is in the doc without manually clicking View image each time.

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  20. Bonjour,

    Pouvoir augmenter la limite du nombre d'utilisateurs dans un Circuit de validation.
    Actuellement, la limite est de 5.
    (Nous avons la possibilité d'ajouter plusieurs étapes. Cependant, les utilisateurs ne sont pas toujours les mêmes : Selon le projet, la facture, l'acheteur initial.)

    Merci!

    1 vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

  • Don't see your idea?